All About: Tie-On Pockets! Part 1: history

I’ve just completed my third pocket. Here’s a look at my process. I hope this post may inspire you the way I’ve been inspired by archived websites from c. 2010.

History

Pockets are fascinating! Sewn-in pockets are fairly new; the original pockets tied on at one’s waist. At that point, what’s the difference between a pocket and a purse? Is a fanny pack a pocket?

Some clothing styles in the European Middle Ages included slits or open sides. A person could tie on their purse, and then reach through the slits to access it. Otherwise, the purse remained hidden, but still accessible. Women might wear their purse so that it hung near the ground, and then hike up their skirt to reach it.

A woman with slits in her outer dress. From Bodleian Library MS Bodl 264 Part 1 Romance of Alexander (ff. 3-208). Flanders (probably Tournai) 1338-1344. fol 144v B
In Artist in her Atelier, the artist wears a purse under her main dress. The skirt is hiked up to reveal both the purse and the decorations on the underskirt. From Des cléres et nobles femmes, Spencer Collection MS. 33, f. 37v, French, c. 1470.
I love this woman who has basically everything she owns tied to her belt. Warrior and young woman in landscape, Urs Graf, 1500-1528.
In this detail from The Wedding Dance (Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1566), you can see a bag attached to the man’s belt while the woman’s bag hangs low under her dress.

The tie-on pocket, as we modern people think of it, was developed in the 16th century. Perhaps growing urban centers led to new ways of deterring thieves.

I originally wrote “pickpockets” without even thinking. Turns out that word dates to 1585-95.

The 17th century brought the innovation of sewn in pockets. For men. Generally in this time period, lower class women wore their pockets on the outside of their clothes, and upper class women inside their clothes.

Pockets were usually embroidered; sewn and decorated by the wearer. They were a good way to practice these domestic skills, and of course a way to create a fully customized item.

I can’t say for sure that she is wearing a pocket, but you can see how the slits line up in her skirt, making it easy to reach into a pocket. Woman making lace in an interior, Caspar Netscher, 1662.
This satirical image shows an upper class woman wearing her pocket as part of her underclothing. Once she’s all laced up, she’ll put on her outer dress. Tight Lacing, or Fashion before Ease, in the style of John Collet, c. 1777,
This woman has a plain white pocket, directly contradicting what I just wrote. Maid Buying a Love-Ditty, Pehr Hilleström d.ä., c. 1796.

People still carried bags, of course. At the end of the 18th century/beginning of the 19th, the fashionable slender silhouettes led to women giving up their pockets and carrying handbags instead. (Again, generally, there are always exceptions.) Reticules were the first version of what we’d recognize as purses/handbags today. They were small and attached to the wearer’s wrist.

Beaded reticule, c. 1810.

Throughout the 19th century, purses grew in size. Some women still wore tie-on pockets, or made use of things like chatelaines, a decorative brooch. From the brooch hung chains or ribbons which were attached to items like keys, scissors, and watches. The chatelaine was then hung from the belt or pinned to the chest or waist.

Roman key still attached to its chain, c. 43 – 410 CE. From the Portable Antiquities Scheme.
Medieval chatelaine. Looks like the carabiner I use to hold my keys! C. 1100 – 1500 CE. From the Portable Antiquities Scheme.
Literally my keys, 7/7/2026. The carabiner itself is c. 2003; it was a promotional item from my university’s cafeteria.
Early Modern chatelaine, c. 1650 – 1700 CE. From the Portable Antiquities Scheme.
Late 18th century chatelaine. This is what I think of when I hear that word. This one includes scissors and a sheath for them, a thimble, and the top to a missing needle case. From The British Museum.
This chatelaine from the late 1800s includes a notebook, pencil holder, and small purse. From The Met.
Miss Mary Edwards by William Hogarth, 1742. She wears a small chatelaine on her right/viewer’s left.

Sewn in pockets for men appeared in the late 1600s and have been standard ever since. There are theories about why the same isn’t true for women’s pockets. A common argument is they interrupt the silhouette. Or perhaps it’s a way to sell more stuff: you need a purse, you need a bag, you need to buy the materials to make a new pocket. Or perhaps it’s way to curtail women’s freedom. It’s much harder to leave if you have to grab your purse versus just having your items already on your body.

A pattern for pockets from the 1941 French magazine Pour Elle

I like this pattern from a 1941 magazine (pictured above) because it seems to confirm and refute those theories. To my eyes, the pockets don’t interrupt her silhouette, but then why didn’t the skirt have sewn in pockets? It’s tied to her waist, so her items are on her if she needs to go. . .but does she wear the pockets in the house? When she’s sitting down? And while this pattern is “free,” you had to get the magazine and have the materials to make the pockets.

Further Reading

Burman, Barbara and Ariane Fennetaux. The Pocket: A Hidden History of Women’s Lives, 1660 – 1900. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2019.
www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/a/history-of-pockets

Leave a Reply

Natasha Luepke

Discover more from Natasha Luepke

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading